FAQ
Accommodations
Florida Activities
Florida Attractions
Florida Dining
Florida Night Life
Boat Tours
Web Cam
Contact Us

Trust The Florida Gold Coast Travel Guide

Back to the Florida Gold Coast Travel Guide

South Florida's world wide Travel Guide! Now with streaming video!

 

 

 

Home
Up
Next

Traffic Cam
Aventura Mall
Dinning

 

 

To Join the class action suite against the city of Aventura's illegal traffic tickets (civil fines) click here or call

The law offices of Schuler, Halvorson & Weisser

Toll Free: 800.689.8180
Phone: 561.689.8180
Fax: 561.684.9683

 

Lawyers are racing to put a stop to red-light traffic cameras.

In the past two weeks, several hundred drivers from throughout the state have joined class action suits filed against Aventura, Miami Gardens, Juno Beach and Orlando. Jason Weisser, an attorney leading the latest charge, says he plans to file a lawsuit against Pembroke Pines, North Miami, Homestead and 16 other local governments in the next two weeks.

“The phone has been ringing consistently over the last two weeks,” said Weisser, whose West Palm Beach-based firm, Schuler, Halvorson and Weisser has recruited clients through newspaper advertisements. “They are violating people’s constitutional rights (in order) to make a buck.”

On Aug. 17, the Fort Pierce City Commission gave the initial OK to put red-light cameras at five intersections. The intersections have not been identified. A second public hearing to officially adopt an ordinance is expected to go before the commission during its 6:30 p.m. Sept. 8 meeting.

Since the state doesn’t support the use of video cameras to issue uniform traffic citations or their use on state roads, Fort Pierce Police Chief Sean Baldwin sought legal advice from the city attorney on whether the cameras are legal.

City Attorney Rob Schwerer said his office would not give a legal opinion on the validity and the legality of red-light cameras because the matter is being litigated.

“That is an issue that is going to be decided by the courts ultimately, unless the state Legislature resolves the issue before it gets through the trial or appellate levels,” Schwerer said. “It’s currently being professed by municipalities that it is legal to do this under the home rule powers act, and we would support that position it is legal under the home rule powers act unless the court rules otherwise.”

Meantime, Greg Parks, a representative with American Traffic Solutions, the city’s camera system vendor, said cities continue to move forward with the program.

“Anything as with Tallahassee can happen,” Parks said. “We’ll continue to invest heavily and major jurisdictions like Hillsborough County, Orlando and Palm Beach County are moving forward, so we’re very confident.”

Critics complain that red-light cameras violate drivers’ due process and equal protection rights. Earlier this year, two separate lawsuits were filed over their use — one in Aventura filed in February, and one in the Tampa suburb of Temple Terrace, filed in April.

The Aventura case is scheduled for a summary judgment hearing on Nov. 10; the other case is in the beginning stages.

Cities say the cameras deter drivers from running red lights, prevent accidents and save lives. The cameras snap a photo of the car’s license plate, then owners receive a citation in the mail.

Pembroke Pines Police Chief Dan Giustino said before the city’s camera at Southwest 129th Avenue and Pines Boulevard went live in April 2008, the city recorded 19 accidents over a 16 month period. Just nine wrecks have occurred over the past 16 months.

But lawyers for the fined drivers argue that governments are not permitted under state law to regulate stop lights. They say that under state law, police officers cite drivers who run red lights and those tickets can be contested in county court. Yet in cities with red light cameras, no officer witnesses any infraction and it is the vehicle’s owner, not the driver, who is cited. In addition, the owner can only appeal to a special magistrate, who typically works for the city.

“It’s like having the officer who wrote you the ticket rule on your case,” said attorney Brett Luskin, who filed the original Aventura suit. “It’s a flat violation of state law. I want the judge to declare these things are invalid.”

The state attorney general issued an opinion in 2005 that cities cannot use cameras to issue traffic citations. Cities sidestep that by citing car owners with code violations that do not count against driving records. Fines generally cost $125 for first-time offenders.

The state does not allow red light cameras to be posted on state property. A bill that would have permitted it died in the waning hours of the last legislative session. The bill, which would have included a $150 fine, received overwhelming approval in both chambers. But it died after the Senate failed to win support for its proposal to keep a larger portion for state coffers.

In Pembroke Pines, Broward’s first city to install such a camera, city leaders are moving ahead with plans to erect five more red light cameras. On Wednesday night, their camera provider, American Traffic Solutions, agreed to share the cost of providing refunds and defending the city in court.

Still, city attorney Sam Goren conceded the lawsuits could have a “persuasive effect.”

In Juno Beach, the city intends to install cameras by mid-October at Donald Ross Road and Ellison Wilson Road, and Donald Ross Road and U.S. 1.

“We hope to improve driver behavior in terms of traffic law compliance and thereby reduce accidents,” said Police Chief Dennis Weiner. “It’s not uncommon for people (to file suits) whether or not they have a good legal basis.”

 

 

Copyright © 1998 - 2008 Florida Gold Coast Publishing/Thanks to Florida State Archives Photographic Collection/webmaster@FloridaGoldCoast.com/Click here for Web Design or to get listed on the Guide